meta name="monetag" content="5b565e11f8d7f341769882a362b86e14">
US

The Trump administration vs. Mass. colleges



Local News

The Trump administration is threatening to cut school funding and revoke student visas in a stated effort to combat antisemitism.

Demonstrators chant during a rally at Cambridge Common April 12, calling on Harvard University to resist President Trump’s influence on the institution. Erin Clark/Globe Staff

Local universities have faced a steady stream of blows under the Trump administration—from sudden visa cancellations to threats of funding cuts tied to strict new demands.

Already, the State Department has reportedly revoked the visas of hundreds of students, affecting those at area schools such as Emerson College, Berklee College of Music, Boston University, Northeastern, UMass, and Tufts

The list is growing. 

The terminations are part of a nationwide effort led by the Department of State and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to terminate the legal status of international students who have allegedly engaged in criminal behavior while in the U.S., or in activities in support of U.S.-designated terrorist groups like Hamas.

The Trump administration is also freezing key university grants over campus protests against Israel’s war in Gaza. It halted over $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts to Harvard for not meeting its demands. Harvard is suing the Trump administration in response.

The National Institutes of Health is also trying to cut hundreds of millions of dollars of medical research funding at local universities. A federal judge blocked the move in early March, which the NIH could still appeal.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion programs are also on the chopping block in higher education. 

In March, the U.S. Education Department said it was investigating dozens of universities, including MIT, for alleged racial discrimination, citing ties to a nonprofit that helps Black and Latino students pursue business degrees. 

For the most recent updates, keep reading below: 

International students admitted to Harvard University can now hold a spot at another foreign university as “a backup plan,” according to an email the Ivy League school sent to admitted students.

The email, sent by Harvard College Admissions and Financial Aid, acknowledges that families abroad are concerned about “recent events here in the United States.” Recently, Harvard refused to comply with the Trump Administration’s demands to make widespread changes. The administration promptly froze $2.2 billion in federal research grants.

One of the demands included to “commit to full cooperation with DHS and other federal regulators,” a letter sent to Harvard earlier this month read.

Twelve international students and recent graduates at Harvard also had their visas revoked as the federal government’s crackdown on student visas continues to ripple through college campuses. Students were affected at other area schools such as Emerson College, Berklee College of Music, Boston University, Northeastern, UMass, and Tufts

“We write to reassure you that we are doing everything possible to enroll the students we have admitted and to provide guidance in the face of current uncertainties,” the admissions office wrote to admitted international students. “While students are usually required to hold a place at only one university after May 1, we understand that many of you may feel compelled to have a backup plan.”

The office told students that “the situation at Harvard might be replicated at other American universities as well as the fact that the I-20 document is university-specific,” so the students can’t hold a spot at another U.S. school.

The university also noted that admitted students could defer their acceptance for a year, particularly if students aren’t able to secure a visa before the start of the school year. If admitted students choose to start at another university, they would have to reapply as a transfer student to Harvard. 

“We hope this authorization provides you and your family with a measure of relief as you consider your options,” the Office of Admissions and Financial Aid wrote. “You have been admitted to Harvard College because we believe you have something special to offer our community. We want you here as our student, and we look forward to working with you to help make that possible.”

Harvard President Alan Garber gave his first interview since university officials decided to sue the Trump administration this week, telling Lester Holt of NBC News that the demands made by federal officials left the school no choice but to fight back. 

In the sit-down interview, which aired Wednesday evening, Holt framed the battle as Garber and Harvard “taking on the most powerful man in the world.” 

Garber sees it differently. To him, Harvard’s move is not only necessary to maintain the school’s independence, but to show that higher education as a whole is worth preserving at any cost. 

“We are defending what I believe is one of the most important lynchpins of the American economy and way of life: our universities,” he said. 

With more than $2 billion in federal funding at risk and the idea of revoking the university’s tax-exempt status floated by President Donald Trump, Garber is bracing for an extended showdown with the federal government. Some are already being laid off, and the Harvard School of Public Health is expected to be particularly impacted due to its heavy reliance on federal dollars. 

Harvard—the nation’s oldest, richest, and most prestigious university—is uniquely positioned to forcefully resist the Trump administration. But Garber admitted some uncertainty about the road ahead, even as he vocally committed to defending the school’s constitutional rights. 

“We don’t know how much we can actually absorb, but what we do know is that we cannot compromise on basic principles, like defense of our First Amendment rights,” he told Holt. 

The administration, Garber said, wants to be able to tell Havard what faculty should be hired and fired. It also wants to directly oversee the school’s admissions processes. The government’s demands were made public by Harvard when it announced that it would not be complying with them. 

The situation is “bigger than Harvard,” he said, particularly because of the threat to lifesaving scientific research that many universities conduct using federal funding. 

One of the first laboratories hit with a stop-work order from the National Institutes of Health was one led by renowned tuberculosis researcher Sarah Fortune. Spliced into the interview with Garber, Holt also spoke with Fortune. She said her work could resume relatively quickly if funding were immediately available again, but as time goes on the “network unravels,” and the damage would become “irrevocable.”

When pro-Palestine demonstrations rocked Harvard last year, Harvard leaders were attacked by pro-Israel voices who said that they were fostering a culture of antisemitism on campus. The Trump administration has leaned on these accusations in its dealings with Harvard, saying its demands are meant to crack down on antisemitism. 

Garber, who has also been accused of stifling the free speech of pro-Palestine activists, told Holt that Harvard does indeed have a “real problem with antisemitism.” He insisted that the university is taking every available measure to fight this problem. But he also maintains that most of the Trump administration’s demands are not truly about antisemitism, saying there is no credible link between that topic and the elimination of research funding. 

“There’s no doubt about the severity of that problem,” Garber said about antisemitism on campus. “We don’t really see the relationship to research funding at Harvard and other universities. They are two different issues.”

The faceoff with the federal government is expected to be lengthy and very costly. Holt asked Garber if this is truly a winnable fight. 

“I don’t know the answer to this question, but the stakes are so high that we have no choice,” Garber said in response. 

The Trump administration on Saturday requested that Harvard University turn over all documents related to its antisemitism task force report, marking the latest in a series of demands directed at the school. 

The request from the Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights is ordering the university to send “all reports” of the university’s task force on combating antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias and combating anti-Muslim, anti-Arab, and anti-Palestinian bias by May 2. 

The data request also asks the university to include the names of the people involved in preparing, editing, and finalizing the reports, drafts, or documents. 

The department is also seeking information related to an op-ed by the co-chairs of the antisemitism task force in The Harvard Crimson. 

Harvard launched both task forces last January, in response to criticism over its handling of rising tensions on campus following the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel. 

The antisemitism task force released preliminary recommendations last June. The report said that the situation for Israeli students at Harvard “has been dire,” with many frequently being subject to “derision and social exclusion.” 

In addition, the anti-Muslim task force found a “deep-seated sense of fear among students, staff, and faculty” with many Muslims, Palestinians, Arab Christians and pro-Palestinian allies describing “a state of uncertainty, abandonment, threat, and isolation, and a pervasive climate of intolerance.”

The preliminary reports say the task force was going to submit a more “substantive” report to the school last fall. However, neither task force issued a final report by the end of the fall semester, according to The Harvard Crimson

The request came only a week after Harvard rebuffed the Trump administration’s list of growing demands. It is only the latest threat directed at Harvard, which was also told it could lose its tax-exempt status and its ability to enroll international students. 

The Department of Education is demanding that Harvard turn over a long list of records concerning the university’s foreign funding and how affiliated employees and researchers interact with foreign governments. 

The records request, which was announced Friday morning, was sent after federal officials found “incomplete and inaccurate disclosures” in Harvard’s foreign reports. 

“As a recipient of federal funding, Harvard University must be transparent about its relations with foreign sources and governments. Unfortunately, our review indicated that Harvard has not been fully transparent or complete in its disclosures, which is both unacceptable and unlawful,” Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement. 

Under a law called Section 117, Harvard and other postsecondary institutions receiving federal funding must disclose foreign gifts and contracts that value $250,000 or more annually. The inaccurate disclosures found by the federal government could represent a violation of an agreement signed last December by Harvard and the government. The Department of Education initiated an investigation of Harvard’s compliance with the law back in 2020, and that concluded with the agreement in December. 

The government is requesting a list of all foreign gifts, grants, and contracts from or with foreign sources. Officials want to know the identities of all known parties involved in these gifts and contracts and are asking for all related communications. The government makes several more demands that are laid out in the official request. 

“As standard practice, Harvard has filed Section 117 reports for decades as part of its ongoing compliance with the law. As is required, Harvard’s reports include information on gifts and contracts from foreign sources exceeding $250K annually. This includes contracts to provide executive education, other training, and academic publications,” Harvard spokesperson Jason Newton told The Boston Globe

McMahon framed the request as a means to ensure Harvard is not working with foreign entities who are opposed to American interests. 

“This records request is the Trump Administration’s first step to ensure Harvard is not being manipulated by, or doing the bidding of, foreign entities, which include actors who are hostile to the interests of the United States and American students,” she said. 

After the Trump administration froze more than $2 billion in federal funding, layoffs have reportedly already started at Harvard University and are likely to continue.

The Harvard School of Public Health is working around a “significant budget crisis,” a spokesperson recently told The Harvard Crimson

Some layoffs of staff and researchers on projects who have lost funding have occurred already. There is not a specific number of cuts officials are targeting. 

HSPH is also reportedly downsizing its physical space. Officials confirmed to the Crimson that the school would exit leases on two buildings near the Longwood campus in Boston: one at 90 Smith St. and another for the fourth floor of the Landmark Center at 401 Park Drive. The former is home to the school’s human resources office and the university’s police department for the Longwood area. The latter is a 40,000-square-foot space with offices, laboratories, and classrooms. 

Of all the schools within Harvard, HSPH is the most reliant on federal funding. Just under half of its budget comes from the federal government, according to The New York Times. The school could also be significantly impacted if the Trump administration follows through on threats to block the university from enrolling international students. About 40% of the students there are international. 

Steve Gortmaker, director of the school’s Prevention Research Center on Nutrition and Physical Activity, told the Times that he is worried about the staff he works with and thinks that conditions will not improve anytime soon. 

“It’s like you’re hunkering down for the beginning of a war, where you think you’re going to be losing a lot of your freedoms and a lot of your resources,” he told the paper. 

HSPH has received three stop-work orders this week, including one that derailed a $60 million contract to study tuberculosis. 

At a town hall event on Wednesday, leaders of Harvard Medical School told attendees that staffing cuts are expected there as well. Julie Joncas, the school’s chief financial officer, reportedly told those gathered that the school had already been dealing with financial challenges before the showdown with the Trump administration. Philanthropic support went down after Harvard’s public response to the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel and the subsequent campus turmoil began a national flashpoint. 

“Harvard has to figure out the solution and what we can do with what limited resources we’re going to be left with when all the dust settles,” Joncas said, per the Crimson

On Wednesday, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem canceled two grants totaling over $2.7 million to Harvard, declaring it “unfit to be entrusted with taxpayer money.”

In a letter to the university, Noem also demanded detailed records on the “illegal and violent activities” of Harvard’s foreign student visa holders by April 30 or the university would face immediate loss of its Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification.

“Harvard bending the knee to antisemitism — driven by its spineless leadership — fuels a cesspool of extremist riots and threatens our national security,” she said.

Noem continued, “With anti-American, pro-Hamas ideology poisoning its campus and classrooms, Harvard’s position as a top institution of higher learning is a distant memory. America demands more from universities entrusted with taxpayer dollars.”

If Harvard cannot verify its compliance with its reporting requirements, the statement says the university would lose the privilege of enrolling international students.

The school enrolls 6,793 international students, which is about 27% of the student population, in the current academic year, according to the university

The Homeland Security release says the $800,303 grant for Implementation Science for Targeted Violence Prevention is a “shockingly skewed study” that branded conservatives as “far-right dissidents” and the $1,934,902 Blue Campaign Program Evaluation and Violence Advisement grant funded Harvard’s “public health propaganda.” 

“Both undermine America’s values and security,” it says. 

The action to cancel the two grant programs follows President Donald Trump’s administration’s decision to freeze $2.2 billion in federal funding to Harvard. Earlier this week, Harvard rejected the Trump administration’s demands. 

The release from Homeland Security also says since Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel, Harvard’s foreign visa-holding “rioters and faculty have spewed anti-Semitic hate, targeting Jewish students.” 

“With a $53.2 billion endowment, Harvard can fund its own chaos– DHS won’t,” the release says. 

In a statement shared with The Boston Globe on Wednesday, a university spokesperson said, “Harvard will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights. We continue to stand by that statement. We will continue to comply with the law and expect the Administration to do the same.”

Sarah Fortune, chair of the Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. – Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

A leading tuberculosis researcher at Harvard said Tuesday that she received a stop-work order from the National Institutes of Health. 

The order arrived soon after the university announced it would not comply with a lengthy set of demands set forth by the Trump administration. In response, the federal government froze $2.2 billion in federal research grants for Harvard. 

The scientist, Sarah Fortune, leads a lab where researchers work to understand tuberculosis and work towards eventually eradicating the disease. An estimated 1.25 million people died from tuberculosis in 2023, likely making it the “world’s leading cause of death from a single infectious agent,” according to the World Health Organization

Through a $60 million contract with the NIH, Fortune was able to work with an international team of experts to produce groundbreaking research. But now, Fortune cannot distribute funds to those she works with at other universities. She is unable to use federal dollars to fund anything related to the tuberculosis study, the Boston Globe reported. 

The funding freeze likely means that scientists will be laid off.

Fortune also told the paper that researchers may have to kill macaques, a type of primate used in a vaccine study at the University of Pittsburgh. Harvard is funding the project. 

Fortune said the researchers may have to kill the animals because they are no longer allowed to use federal funds to feed and care for them. 

“The macaques, can you believe, they’re so precious,” Fortune told the paper. “It’s such a heavy responsibility to work with them and to just be asked to kill them halfway through the study…” Fortune said, trailing off.

“Anybody who has animal studies ongoing … is looking at killing the animals,” if funding is cut, Fortune said.

Despite the ramifications on her work, Fortune said that she supports the decision made by Harvard’s leaders. 

“I feel better about going down on the right side of this action,” Fortune told the Globe

An Education Department official told the Associated Press that hospitals affiliated with Harvard, which operate as separate non-profits that are financially independent from the school, will not be affected by the announced cuts in federal funding.

Instead, a Department of Education spokesperson told the Globe that the hold on more than $2.2 billion in funding will be limited to the university itself.

Harvard Medical School is affiliated with five Boston-area teaching hospitals. Hospital staff often have teaching appointments at Harvard Medical School. 

The immediate funding freeze, the AP reports, will most likely impact research at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, which says 46% of its budget was through federal grants last year. 

The freeze in federal research grants for Harvard comes after the university resisted demands for changes to campus policy. 

Although some have championed Harvard’s stand against demands to crack down on protesters and pursue more viewpoint diversity among faculty, others worry that life-saving scientific research will be threatened

According to the AP, federal money accounted for 10.5% of Harvard’s revenue in 2023.

On Tuesday, a federal judge blocked immigration authorities from arresting a Chinese Massachusetts Institute of Technology senior after the federal government revoked her student visa. 

According to court documents and The Boston Globe, which obtained a recording of the hearing, the 22-year-old student identified as “Jane Doe” filed a civil suit in federal court in Boston on Friday against the US Department of Homeland Security, its secretary, Kristi Noem, and Todd Lyons, the acting director for the US Immigration and Custom Enforcement. 

The student’s lawyers in court said that the US Department of State notified her on Monday that her visa had been revoked and that she needed to leave the country “immediately.”

The student also filed a motion seeking a temporary restraining order on Monday. 

In a letter to the campus community, MIT President Sally Kornbluth announced that nine people connected to the university have had their visas revoked. 

At Tuesday’s hearing in federal court in Boston, the Globe reports that her lawyer says that she did not engage in any activities that would typically lead to a termination and that ICE did not present evidence that she is a risk to national security or the public. 

Court filings show that the judge ruled that federal authorities are temporarily prohibited from arresting or detaining the student, terminating her database status, or transporting her out of the state before her next hearing on April 23.

On Monday, MIT President Sally Kornbluth announced that nine students, recent graduates and postdocs had unexpectedly had their visas and immigration status revoked since April 4. 

Kornbluth said the school is “extremely concerned that there appears to have been no notice or explanation from the government for the revocation.” 

Kornbluth wrote that unexpected revocations are sending “alarms” throughout the campus. 

MIT is in the business of attracting and supporting “exceptionally talented people,” wrote Kornbluth. To find those “rare people, we open ourselves to talent from every corner of the United States and from around the globe.” 

Kornbluth wrote that the university would be “gravely diminished without the students and scholars” from other nations. 

“The threat of unexpected visa revocations will make it less likely that top talent from around the world will come to the US – and that will damage American competitiveness and scientific leadership for years to come,” she continued. 

Kornbluth also provided an update on the National Institutes of Health’s sudden cap on “indirect cost” reimbursements required for research on campus. 

In February, MIT joined several other schools and associations in filing a lawsuit against the NIH. The court granted a permanent injunction, which remains intact until the government seeks an appeal. 

Indirect costs cover things like data storage, hazardous materials management, radiation safety, and the maintenance and renewal of research facilities and equipment. 

On Friday evening, the Department of Energy (DOE) imposed a cap similar to the one from NIH to cut more than $400 million in annual spending. 

DOE announced that university grants would no longer cover indirect costs at previously agreed-to rates. Instead, they would terminate all grants unless they conformed to a blanket rate of 15%. 

Kornbluth wrote that the DOE grants support the work of nearly 1,000 members of the MIT community. The 15% cap would amount to $30-$35 million of cuts to MIT annually. 

In response, MIT joined several peer schools and higher ed associations in filing a lawsuit to stop the action. 

“We believe these proposed cuts are unlawful and pose a direct threat to MIT’s mission,” wrote Kornbluth in a statement. “They fracture the compact between the US government and its research institutions that, since the end of World War II, has fueled America’s innovation economy and ensured the nation’s security, prosperity and quality of life.”



https://bdc2020.o0bc.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/JCCZKYLJZO24OBXNVL76IILHUA-67fe6aba1cdb4-768×432.jpg

2025-04-28 20:56:43

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button